• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

Adding Taxi Segment - Wrong Runway Number?

Messages
108
Country
us-pennsylvania
I have converted a working (in FSX) runway to XML (via SDE). It has a missing taxi segment. The runway number is = 2. When I add the segment over the runway the runway number assigned to the taxiway is = 1. The segment connects the end points ok. Of course this gives a compile error. The runway heading is 8.25. I suspect that the program is basing the taxi assignment on the heading and not on the runway number.

When constructing a taxiway on top of a runway the program makes it a Type = Taxi. The user has to catch this and change it to Runway. Is it possible to note that the taxiway is on top of a runway and assign the correct Type when it is created?

Regards,
Dick Boley
 
Last edited:
The taxiway number defaults to 1, as that is the first in the list. It's not based on a heading or anything else.

If your runway is #2, then the taxiway should abe associated with runway #2. Assigning it to runway #1 would cause an error.

Having the taxiway automatically become a runway taxiway if it is on top of a runway is an interesting idea, but I think it may also cause problems. How do you know a taxiway is on top of a runway? What if only part of the taxiway is on top of a runway, or what if it's a very small segment that is crossing a runway, but should not be a runway taxiway? These are rhetorical questions that I need to discuss here in order to determine the best solution. Of course if you'd like to give you opinion please don't hesitate to do so.

-Russell
 
Oh, one more thing. When creating a taxiway if you create a taxiway segment with a taxiway point that has only one other taxiway associated with it, then the new taxiway segment will take the properties of that taxiway. So if you creatre a runway taxiway segment over part of the runway, then create more taxiway segments from that segment, the newly created ones will also be runway taxiways.

Hopefully that is clear. It's a but difficult to explain without pictures.

-Russell
 
If I erase a taxiway segment for runway number 14 and then replace it the taxiway number is now 01. You get an error Taxiway Without A Runway as expected.

To assign a taxiway the correct number, both ends of the segment must be within the runway. I have no idea if there is enough easy to access runway info to make this determination.


The taxiway number defaults to 1, as that is the first in the list. It's not based on a heading or anything else.

If your runway is #2, then the taxiway should abe associated with runway #2. Assigning it to runway #1 would cause an error.

Having the taxiway automatically become a runway taxiway if it is on top of a runway is an interesting idea, but I think it may also cause problems. How do you know a taxiway is on top of a runway? What if only part of the taxiway is on top of a runway, or what if it's a very small segment that is crossing a runway, but should not be a runway taxiway? These are rhetorical questions that I need to discuss here in order to determine the best solution. Of course if you'd like to give you opinion please don't hesitate to do so.

-Russell
 
Back
Top