• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

Aircraft power setting (% BHP) vs. RPM

Messages
217
Country
azerbaijan
Probably, it's just the most noob question of all noob questions ever asked on aviation forums/fora but I'm really interested to know HOW a pilot determines the power regime for a particular cruise altitude? In other words, how he's supposed to adjust RPM and MP to get the required economic or performance power setting?

The table below shows RPM, MP and BHP figures for a typical C182Q and, as you can see, one can use the relatively same (or, calibrated) percentage of BHP at different RPMs.

Or, does this mean that adjusting MAP indicator to show 20Hg on 6,000 ft altitude @ 2,300 RPM and Std. Temp will automatically put you on 65% BHP?!? :confused:

17307825.jpg
 
Last edited:
Yeah, 2300 rpm and 20 MAP will give you 65% BHP and 133 KIAS cruise speed at 11.3 GPH.
 
I am not sure if your question is how a pilot uses it, how its rated, or how it applies to the design aspect of FS.
I will list my understanding of how it is rated to give an understanding of how its used.

To get the BHP % you want depends on temp, humidity, altitude, throttle position/rpm setting and fuel grade used recommend and rated by factory, although abnormal fuel grade is not generally factored, higher fuel grades burn hotter and can generate a higher BHP at lower throttle positions on fixed pitch, with additional prop pitch and manifold pressure on constant speed props. Even though BHP is generally a fixed reading at a given RPM, atmospheric conditions affect settings to achieve it.

Now its pretty easy for a pilot, even student pilots, to lean out and throttle adjust for a specific BHP at atmosphere. However most pilots dont even pay attention to BHP or configure to perform on that scale unless the flight is over half of the endurance of the aircraft at a given power setting; or if the aircraft is owned and fuel is paid per gallon. If you rent and rental is wet, usually its overlooked, and RPM/MP is used with EGT monitoring to set the pitch and throttle, whereas when setting BHP, you adjust the throttle, mixture and pitch to match settings to the chart according to atmospheric conditions. This is not saying its wise or safe to ignore the BHP rating under select specs as a pilot, but it is one of those things most recreational pilots ignore or rarely pay attention to as they generally keep flights short and low. Along with the chart you supplied, there are others we use to determine the final setup of mixture, prop pitch(constant speed prop), and throttle.

Pilots that work for airlines or charter/business operations who are Commercial certified must use BHP and other ratings to make their flights legal.

BHP rating:

Firstly, HP is just a measurement scale (like how we use a ruler to determine length by meters, yards, feet or inches), and is not to be confused with the HP rating even though they are used interchangably.

The BHP is a true HP rating at the flywheel of the engine or the output shaft of the engine for aircraft, just like a cars HP rating is at the axle/wheels, but unlike a car, BHP is true hp, not estimated, as a cars HP rating is checked on a rotating drum dynamometer then it is rated at the axle/wheels, it loses a few HP in the transmission of power from the shaft to the wheels, it would be an estimate, not true hp. If a car has HP rating at the flywheel or shaft, it is true. Engine HP ratings are at the flywheel or shaft, which is usually what a car dealer will advertise its HP as, even though the wheels will show less HP on a dynamometer, but only 1-15HP depending on the transmission.

There are also other places to rate HP, such as cam/crank shaft (SHP) which is not the same as Torque, where torque is a force of twist on the shaft generated by the engine HP. According to Wkipedia, 1 horsepower is the amount of force needed to lift 550 pounds 1 foot in 1 second.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsepower

All HP ratings are performed at a specific setting; in this case the setting is speed. RPM is a speed rating in number of times around a central point in a set amount of time. Similar to how best rate of climb is set at the angle and speed at which you will cover so much distance and climb this much in altitude over a set amount of time; normally rated by feet per minute or meters per minute.

On aircraft, the flywheel is the standard location for BHP rating using a braking dynamometer. There are also ratings for SHP (shaft horse power) which is rated for the delivery to the prop.

The reason for the flywheel, and not the propellor is because some aircraft can use different size and material propellors, which would change the BHP per choice.

I am not an aviation mechanic, but this is how I understood it when it was explained to me in my pilot training. It may be incorrect, and if it is and you have the correction, please post it and I will remove any inaccuracies in this post to avoid confusion.

And I apologize this is a little off topic, but I thought it may be relevant.
 
Last edited:
In answer to the OP's actual question... the pilot would use the left two columns to arrive at the values in the other column sets. They would set RPM and MP... and should expect the performance listed in the other columns based on temperature.
 
In answer to the OP's actual question... the pilot would use the left two columns to arrive at the values in the other column sets. They would set RPM and MP... and should expect the performance listed in the other columns based on temperature.

The same principle is true for a/c without manifold pressure gauges. You adjust throttle to control RPM, set RPM at the reading needed, then factor the pressure alt and temps will give you the approximate %BHP/%MCP (mcp is not as commonly seen, maximum continuous power)

Should your RPM gauge have a failure, you could use the OAT, Pressure alt, Mixture, Vacuum, and EGT to determine avg RPM to get BHP; you could even factor Fuel flow if ac is equipped to get closer to exact reading. Its doable but increases workload dramatically, as such the FAA wont allow it.
Also note, it would be iillegal to fly without the tachometer, if it fails in flight, its a pan situation and you would need to land ASAP as it could be more than a failed guage.

Note: Standard Temp is 15C/59F in the ICAO/FAA certified world.
Pressure is 1,013.25/29.92 in ICAO/FAA.
Temperature decreases about 2-3 degrees C per 1000ft (moisture dependent)
In standard conditions, temp decreases about 3.5-7 degrees F for every 1000 feet of altitude until where the troposphere ends.

Below is an easy to read table on temps vs alt at standard.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/weather/wstdatmo.htm

Performance charts are a/c model specific (based on engine used).
C182Q uses Continental O-470-U 230 hp (172 kW) at 2400 rpm, dry weight 412 lb (187 kg) Constant Speed 3-blade prop.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_182#Variants
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_O-470#Carbureted_models
 
Last edited:
Sure Keven... but... that wasn't the question.

The OP wanted to know how the tables were utilized... your dissertation into the mechanics and theories of internal combustion engines... well, more than he really needed. :wink:
 
Sure Keven... but... that wasn't the question.

The OP wanted to know how the tables were utilized... your dissertation into the mechanics and theories of internal combustion engines... well, more than he really needed. :wink:

It can be assumed that was what he was asking :) The original post actually asks how the pilot determines it, not only how to use the chart.

I'm really interested to know HOW a pilot determines the power regime for a particular cruise altitude? In other words, how he's supposed to adjust RPM and MP to get the required economic or performance power setting?

Which is why I had earlier stated

I am not sure if your question is how a pilot uses it, how its rated, or how it applies to the design aspect of FS.
I will list my understanding of how it is rated to give an understanding of how its used.


And I havent been called Keven since the 2nd grade :cool:
 
Last edited:
Kevin, WarpD, and Heretic,

Thank you very much guys for quite an extensive discussion on the topic. Your answers... well, are even more than I actually wanted to know! :)

Highly appreciated!
 
Back
Top