• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

Altitude Errors

Messages
36
I'm not sure if you can help me with this or not, but I am running your version 1.4 I've made a flight plan and the flights didn't show up unless compiled as FS9, which of course tells me that I have some FS9 bgls in my FSX folder. It turns out that Ultimate Traffic X (note the X) is compiling a very, very large FS9 bgl.

I've tried to convert this a couple of times, but even after manually correcting all the 'altitude' warnings in the message.txt file, your program will not recompile my Ultimate Traffic flight plans as an FSX bgl. I get an error that states there is an invalid altitude (0) (I believe this is the wording, I don't have the patience to try compiling again - it takes several minutes to save the flight plan file.)

As it stands, I either lose all my Ultimate Traffic traffic, or I must compile all my ai packages as FS9, it seems.

Any ideas?

Thanks
 

gadgets

Resource contributor
Messages
9,388
Country
ca-britishcolumbia
I do not have Ultimate Traffic (X or not), so I'm unable to test the file. If you can compress the file to less than 10mb (my e-mail attachment limit) and send it to me, I'll take a look. (I appreciate that, technically, this would be a breach of the license agreement but, under the circumstances I'm sure it would be tolerated. I have no other interest in Ultimate Traffic - I already own My Traffic X - and would destroy the file after testing.)

Alternately, if you would load it once more (Open bgl, not convert) and send me one or more (as necessary) screenshots of the offending flightplan(s) expanded in the leg editor (either leg or text), that may be enough.

Finally, I'm just putting "the finishing touches" on a new version of AI Flight Planner. It doesn't do a great deal more than 1.4, but what it does it does a lot "leaner" and faster. It's been undergoing beta testing for a couple of weeks. I expect to release it for an open beta in a day or two. The new version will allow you to save/compile/convert with certain errors, including altitude errors.

Don
 
Messages
36
I found this post on the UT forums and it worked. Apparently for some reason, altitudes are either entered or converted to 0.

----------------
I gave this solution some months ago:

I searched "0,F" in flightplans.txt with Wordpad and replaced all of them with "280,F".

You have to mark Match whole word only to find "0,F".

Good Luck



Denis
 

gadgets

Resource contributor
Messages
9,388
Country
ca-britishcolumbia
I hope there are no C-172's in the Aircraft file. ;)

I am concerned, however, that you claim to have fixed all the offending flight plans and the file still wouldn't compile. That being said, I encountered a number of "fringe" errors in 1.4 while developing the new version which have been fixed. When I release the new version to open beta, I'd appreciate it if you'd try again. The new version should cope with the such errors (on the basis of "if it worked in FS9 even though the AI may not have performed as intended, it will probably also work in FSX) - but will report the errors anyway.

Glad the difficulty has been solved for now.

Don
 
Messages
36
I don't recall what the errors in the message.txt file said, but the error in every case wound up being an altitude in the UT flight plan that was over 100,000' such as 1004. There were several that I fixed. Looks like errors on the high end were caught by your compiler, but the 0's weren't I'll be glad to try the next version. I think there were only 3 or 4 of the offending '0' that I changed to 280, so hopefully these aircraft are carrying oxygen or parachutes.
 

gadgets

Resource contributor
Messages
9,388
Country
ca-britishcolumbia
AIFP tags any altitude of FL1000 or higher as unrealstic. However, in the forthcoming release, it won't stop you from saving/compiling the file.

Don
 
Top