• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

Annoying FSX default Runway Thermals

Messages
8,893
I have noticed on some web sites people complaining about user planes that want to float down a runway rather then continue their glidepath to the touchdown markers.

I have not paid much attention to these post until recently when I started working with Savannah, GA (KSAV).

There appears to be a thermal effect that starts at about 200 ft from the threshold of the default runways in FSX and extends the entire length of the runways. You actually have to force the plane to get through this effect barrier in order to land.

It might also be a ground effect that FSX is now using for flair but it is not setup correctly and causes many landing problems once the plane reaches the 200 ft descent GP altitude.

At first I thought it might be a setting in the weather but have reset weather many times even with a default startup to severe clear and no options for winds, gust, turb, etc. I also changed all settings in my registered ver of FSUIPC and yet the effects still exsits.

What ever MS has done in the area of Thermals or ground effect is to sensitive at certain airport runways so I am trying to find where the vertex are located in their respectful bgl's.

If I can locate the code I might be able to see if a LAT/LON is misplaced or a way to de-sensitize these unknowns which could be either a misplaced thermal or overly sensitive ground flair effect.

Can anyone shed some light on this issue?


EDIT ******

I have found a setting in FSX that eliminates my problem

Settings/Display/Weather

I had to place a checkmark in the box that says

Disable Turbulence and Thermal effects on Aircraft.

This disables all the entire airplanes even though many airports are not sensitive to the thermal effects of most runways. It appears that only certain airports need their runways desensitized more so then others.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps it has something to do with underlying landclass tile?
If I remember it correctly, thermals are connected with landclass.
 
It appears that only certain airports need their runways desensitized more so then others.

If that is the case, then it appears that this thermal effect is some new item in the bgl's for FSX.

Are you absolutely sure that this effect is all in the bgl? Could it possible be in the .air file?
 
Back
Top