-
Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:
- Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
- Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
- Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
- Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
- Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
- Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.
Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.
By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.
FS2004 Clouds and transparent parts
- Thread starter hgschnell
- Start date
=rk=
Resource contributor
- Messages
- 4,620
- Country
Hello. Remove all texture from the model, or make a group that is glass only, remove all texture, perform the next procedure and use the MCX Merge Tool to combine the glass with the rest of the model. Once all texture has been removed from all the glass, now texture only the outside faces of the glass and under no circumstances should texture be applied to both sides. Export and compile this and the see through issue will be gone.
Also, the simulator does not support direct import of transparent Sketchup parts. Arno has written MCX such that it interprets transparent parts and applies settings that Arno has determined to be appropriate for transparency. Obviously this algorithm can't determine whether a modeler has taken two transparent polygon faces and applied two conflicting z bias attributes, or anything like that, but you can, because you've created it.
Results are more consistent when you apply the traditional textures and attributes that you exactly intend and not rely on an algorithm to do this.
Also, the simulator does not support direct import of transparent Sketchup parts. Arno has written MCX such that it interprets transparent parts and applies settings that Arno has determined to be appropriate for transparency. Obviously this algorithm can't determine whether a modeler has taken two transparent polygon faces and applied two conflicting z bias attributes, or anything like that, but you can, because you've created it.
Results are more consistent when you apply the traditional textures and attributes that you exactly intend and not rely on an algorithm to do this.
=rk=
Resource contributor
- Messages
- 4,620
- Country
It is adequate to use material attributes only, no actual texture required, however the same one sided rule holds and for consistency, it should always be the same face, in relation to the inside of the model. Presumably you could texture, or define material attributes, for all the inner faces, leaving the outer ones blank and have the same result, however if you texture some inner and some outer faces and they become visually aligned, z bias issues will make some panes look unnaturally dark, or even opaque. A rule of thumb to remember is that a polygon must have color, or texture to render. If there is no color, the sim treats the polygon as if it doesn't exist and so by extension, removing color from one face, removes it from the render and any possible conflicts.
As I feared, the one-sided materials were not the solution.
It is more complex and a very old problem. Like always Arno had an explanation:
"Drawing order problems with transparent textures" in the wiki.
I have to achieve that the inner sides are drawn before the outer sides of the polygons.
The material names could lead to a solution.
If anybody wants to try it, I can send the sketchup (skp) file.
It is more complex and a very old problem. Like always Arno had an explanation:
"Drawing order problems with transparent textures" in the wiki.
I have to achieve that the inner sides are drawn before the outer sides of the polygons.
The material names could lead to a solution.
If anybody wants to try it, I can send the sketchup (skp) file.
Hi Guenther:
This post contains some related information and links to "worked examples" by rhumbaflappy:
https://www.fsdeveloper.com/forum/t...al-with-alpha-transparency.446555/post-834935
...for Arno's example objects originally cited in the wiki
Drawing order problems with transparent textures
https://www.fsdeveloper.com/wiki/index.php?title=Drawing_order_problems_with_transparent_textures
Another thread on related issues:
https://www.fsdeveloper.com/forum/t...ible-through-semi-transparent-texture.445561/
FYI: *.SKP and *.KMZ export files of your 3D model from Sketchup would preserve any 2-sided Faces ...for troubleshooting / learning
Depending on options selected, the default Collada *.DAE exporter may disable any 2-sided Faces ...limiting troubleshooting / learning
I am not certain yet as to whether the WaveFront *.OBJ 3D export file format preserves- or disables- any 2-sided Faces
AFAIK, most accurate MCX I/O of Sketchup 3D models mapped with transparent texture image Materials may be achieved via these plugins:
TIG's Import OBJ with Materials v2.2
sketchucation.com
TIG's OBJ Exporter v3.0
sketchucation.com
I hope this info may prove helpful to I/O to / from MCX ......for troubleshooting / learning.
Please attach the 3D file format of your choice to this thread (or via PM) to expedite resolving this FS9 transparency / Z-sorting issue.
GaryGB
This post contains some related information and links to "worked examples" by rhumbaflappy:
https://www.fsdeveloper.com/forum/t...al-with-alpha-transparency.446555/post-834935
...for Arno's example objects originally cited in the wiki
Drawing order problems with transparent textures
https://www.fsdeveloper.com/wiki/index.php?title=Drawing_order_problems_with_transparent_textures
Another thread on related issues:
https://www.fsdeveloper.com/forum/t...ible-through-semi-transparent-texture.445561/
FYI: *.SKP and *.KMZ export files of your 3D model from Sketchup would preserve any 2-sided Faces ...for troubleshooting / learning
Depending on options selected, the default Collada *.DAE exporter may disable any 2-sided Faces ...limiting troubleshooting / learning
I am not certain yet as to whether the WaveFront *.OBJ 3D export file format preserves- or disables- any 2-sided Faces
AFAIK, most accurate MCX I/O of Sketchup 3D models mapped with transparent texture image Materials may be achieved via these plugins:
TIG's Import OBJ with Materials v2.2
Import OBJ with Materials | SketchUcation
3D SketchUp Community for Design and Engineering Professionals.
TIG's OBJ Exporter v3.0
SketchUp Plugins | PluginStore | SketchUcation
SketchUp Plugin and Extension Store by SketchUcation provides free downloads of hundreds of SketchUp extensions and plugins
I hope this info may prove helpful to I/O to / from MCX ......for troubleshooting / learning.
Please attach the 3D file format of your choice to this thread (or via PM) to expedite resolving this FS9 transparency / Z-sorting issue.
GaryGB
Last edited:
What a lot of info for a Sketchup rookie!
Thanks a lot, as I am not a native English speaker it is a little hard sometimes to understand all details (and without details it remains nonsense)
But today I have some (unexpected) success with my Sketchup objekt.
I created 2 materials _inner_glass.bmp and _outer_glass.bmp and applied them to both sides of my glass polygons. And surprise: it looks fine!
Have to do a little fine tuning for the lights inside, but I think this could be done.
Thanks a lot, as I am not a native English speaker it is a little hard sometimes to understand all details (and without details it remains nonsense)
But today I have some (unexpected) success with my Sketchup objekt.
I created 2 materials _inner_glass.bmp and _outer_glass.bmp and applied them to both sides of my glass polygons. And surprise: it looks fine!
Have to do a little fine tuning for the lights inside, but I think this could be done.
Last edited:
To soon for congrats, the lights inside are the next hill to climb.
I used effects in ADE and tried to attach effects in MCX, nothing is displayed correctly like before.
Even the naming trick did not work (fx_2.bmp and effect name renamed without success).
So let us search again....
I used effects in ADE and tried to attach effects in MCX, nothing is displayed correctly like before.
Even the naming trick did not work (fx_2.bmp and effect name renamed without success).
So let us search again....
Sorry, I forgot it
=rk=
Resource contributor
- Messages
- 4,620
- Country
Please give this version a try. It was edited in the way I'd suggested and includes a few optimizations. I've noticed that some of the inner faces are not colored, nor textured. This has the opposite effect that I'd described about semi transparent faces, any color or texture on the opposite side of a textured polygon is transparent. All inner faces would need to be textured, to be visible.
=rk=
Resource contributor
- Messages
- 4,620
- Country
Well, there are a lot of inconsistencies. The .dae file uploaded did not include textures, so there's little point in independently verifying that export, one must dig into and export the Sketchup file to get to the textures. The missing colors/textures from the Sketchup model that was uploaded, that are (in)visible in my screen shots, are present in the initial screen shots. They obviously are two different models and these kinds of anomalies make diagnosis impossible.
One thing to note, is that the .bmp files from the Sketchup export do not support transparency, as they have the normal 3 channels, red, green and blue.
Arno has included a module, I believe it is from Adobe, that automatically adds a fourth, alpha channel and applies a 15% grey shade to the layer. The user does not have control over the degree of grey added. This channel defines transparency in FS9. You can do the same procedure in Photoshop, or any graphics program that supports channels, which is what I did. I ran the automatic, "Set default transparent" material attribute template, then I opened the resulting .bmp in Photoshop to darken the alpha layer to about 50%, which had the effect of making the glass more transparent. The only time I have ever seen visual artifacts like you share, is during propeller disk conversions from FS9, to FSX, since earlier versions used a different schema to define transparency, that invariably manifests as opaque prop disks in later versions. I'd noticed flecks like that in the converted disk, which I decided were a consequence of the limited modules ability to graduate shades in a circle, thus the prism like flecks. My solution was to shade the prop disk in Photoshop, which eliminated the flecks. At any rate, there is not accounting, nor discussion of this or a similar effect as a consequence of modeling for FS9, that I can find. You can attribute that to the fact that I am the first person to ever try to render a polygon with only one semi transparent textured side, in FS2004, as likely as that may seem, or it may be the fact that there are other forces at play here.
It is clear you would have had to recompile the model into a scenery .bgl, or maybe you added the model to a library .bgl and placed it manually. Undoubtedly, you've made other, undocumented changes, in exporter settings for example. Anyway, it looks so prefect, at this point, without outside intervention, it's obvious you will prefect it.
One thing to note, is that the .bmp files from the Sketchup export do not support transparency, as they have the normal 3 channels, red, green and blue.
Arno has included a module, I believe it is from Adobe, that automatically adds a fourth, alpha channel and applies a 15% grey shade to the layer. The user does not have control over the degree of grey added. This channel defines transparency in FS9. You can do the same procedure in Photoshop, or any graphics program that supports channels, which is what I did. I ran the automatic, "Set default transparent" material attribute template, then I opened the resulting .bmp in Photoshop to darken the alpha layer to about 50%, which had the effect of making the glass more transparent. The only time I have ever seen visual artifacts like you share, is during propeller disk conversions from FS9, to FSX, since earlier versions used a different schema to define transparency, that invariably manifests as opaque prop disks in later versions. I'd noticed flecks like that in the converted disk, which I decided were a consequence of the limited modules ability to graduate shades in a circle, thus the prism like flecks. My solution was to shade the prop disk in Photoshop, which eliminated the flecks. At any rate, there is not accounting, nor discussion of this or a similar effect as a consequence of modeling for FS9, that I can find. You can attribute that to the fact that I am the first person to ever try to render a polygon with only one semi transparent textured side, in FS2004, as likely as that may seem, or it may be the fact that there are other forces at play here.
It is clear you would have had to recompile the model into a scenery .bgl, or maybe you added the model to a library .bgl and placed it manually. Undoubtedly, you've made other, undocumented changes, in exporter settings for example. Anyway, it looks so prefect, at this point, without outside intervention, it's obvious you will prefect it.
Hi Rick, I hope you are well and the flu gone.
Thanks for your detailed answer and help. You are right, there were a lot of inconsistencies.
In between I textured many parts without color or texture and hope, found them all.
I also forgot my postprocessing of the "inner and outer glass" bmps.
With DXTBmp I added an alpha channel to the 24 Bits and got 32 Bit bmp. so I achieved the transparency of my colored glass.
This works fine for the cloud problem. Looking through the windows in the foreground and the windows in the background is correct and like intended.
That is what I thought, the alpha channel should do with the tranparent parts.
But now I see that there is a side effect totally unwanted: Solid parts behind the windows in the front become transparent!
That is not what a semi transparent glass should do.
(please excuse my clumsy English, school is long ago)
Thanks for your detailed answer and help. You are right, there were a lot of inconsistencies.
In between I textured many parts without color or texture and hope, found them all.
I also forgot my postprocessing of the "inner and outer glass" bmps.
With DXTBmp I added an alpha channel to the 24 Bits and got 32 Bit bmp. so I achieved the transparency of my colored glass.
This works fine for the cloud problem. Looking through the windows in the foreground and the windows in the background is correct and like intended.
That is what I thought, the alpha channel should do with the tranparent parts.
But now I see that there is a side effect totally unwanted: Solid parts behind the windows in the front become transparent!
That is not what a semi transparent glass should do.
(please excuse my clumsy English, school is long ago)
