DAAG in my humble opinion, is a real challenge for all AFCAD concerned FS9 simmers.
I have applied Jim Vile's crosswind techniques to many airports successfully except
that airport and another with similar lay-out, LEMD. Despite my efforts taken days
and days, they both remain out of my reach.
DAAG has two runways (namely : 09/27 & 05/23) in a smart and practicable lay-out
with a VOR/DME in between them. As I understand, in real life 09 & 05 are used for
landing & take-off respectively with easterly prevailing winds and reversely with
westerly ones 23 & 27.
Using ADE9 I added xwind runways until I (think) made FS9 think they are parallel.
And of course, assigned patterns accordingly.
Both runways are the same size long (3500m). With easterly winds I made it.
09 is used by FS9 ATC for landing & 05 for take-off. But, when it comes to prevail
westerly winds ATC uses only 27 for both take-off and landing. By no means 23 is used
by AI traffic even though 23 is available for user plane.
I tried slightly changing the length of the one f them with no luck (sometimes still
uses 09 & 05 instead even with west winds).
Something similar happens at LEMD, where ATC persists to use 36L for landing instead of
take-off only
So now I 've run out of ideas....
Any other ideas, Jim, or anyone else, would be welcome.
Sotiris.
I have applied Jim Vile's crosswind techniques to many airports successfully except
that airport and another with similar lay-out, LEMD. Despite my efforts taken days
and days, they both remain out of my reach.
DAAG has two runways (namely : 09/27 & 05/23) in a smart and practicable lay-out
with a VOR/DME in between them. As I understand, in real life 09 & 05 are used for
landing & take-off respectively with easterly prevailing winds and reversely with
westerly ones 23 & 27.
Using ADE9 I added xwind runways until I (think) made FS9 think they are parallel.
And of course, assigned patterns accordingly.
Both runways are the same size long (3500m). With easterly winds I made it.
09 is used by FS9 ATC for landing & 05 for take-off. But, when it comes to prevail
westerly winds ATC uses only 27 for both take-off and landing. By no means 23 is used
by AI traffic even though 23 is available for user plane.
I tried slightly changing the length of the one f them with no luck (sometimes still
uses 09 & 05 instead even with west winds).
Something similar happens at LEMD, where ATC persists to use 36L for landing instead of
take-off only
So now I 've run out of ideas....
Any other ideas, Jim, or anyone else, would be welcome.
Sotiris.
