• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

FSX:SE GPS APPROACH APPROACH TYPE

Messages
1,749
Country
unitedstates
Does this variable work? When testing we show value of zero. Does it work with other GPS addons like Flight 1 GTN750? Is there a way to detect the type of GPS approach?
We want to detect linear and angular but the list below does not even have LNAV or LPV. Does anyone know the difference between GPS and RNAV in the list below?
(A:GPS APPROACH APPROACH TYPE, Enum)
Approach type :
0 = None
1 = GPS
2 = VOR
3 = NDB
4 = ILS
5 = Localizer
6 = SDF
7 = LDA
8 = VOR/DME
9 = NDB/DME
10 = RNAV
11 = Backcourse
 
Last edited:
Those are all types of approach that might be a feature of a particular airfield and are not airplane related as such.
GPS was the original of its type and has evolved into RNAV of which LNAV and LPV are characteristics.
Roy
 
LNAV/VNAV, LPV, etc... weren't in use when this GPS code was written. I believe the first WAAS was in 2008? As for GPS versus RNAV, the primary difference is that an RNAV approach has an accuracy requirement, called an RNP (which was typically 0.3 (three tenths of a nautical mile)). This accuracy requirement meant that specialized avionics certification was required to fly an RNAV approach. A GPS approach had no such restrictions. GPS approaches are being phased out for the more accurate RNAV approaches since newer GPS systems conform to the RNP certification.
 
Does this variable work? When testing we show value of zero.
(A:GPS APPROACH APPROACH TYPE, Enum) works fine.

It is analogous to the gps variable C:fs9gps:FlightPlanApproachType, although the approach types are listed in different orders for each variable so the numbers returned aren't the same. (A:GPS APPROACH APPROACH TYPE, Enum) will return zero until an approach and transition are selected and loaded. The approach doesn't have to be active, just loaded.

Does it work with other GPS addons like Flight 1 GTN750?
Yes, it should

Is there a way to detect the type of GPS approach?
LNAV and LPV approach types are not included in the gps module (a slightly longer list of approaches can be found here). Furthermore, as far as I know, the gps module does not include approaches for every type in that list. For example, I have found no SDF approaches. But, it has to be on the list to be 'detected'. My comments pertain to the gps.dll module shipped with FSX. LM have upgraded the module since they have been in control by adding capability such as arrival and departure procedures, but I don't know if they have expanded the approach type capability.

We want to detect linear and angular but the list below does not even have LNAV or LPV.
No idea what you mean by this. Would you please explain further?

It sounds as if you are opening the door to the gps module’s world. If so, welcome. Make a pot of coffee and prepare for study and much testing. There’s a lot in there, but anyone with good xml skills and persistence can get it.

Bob
 
Last edited:
Back
Top