Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.
By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

What people do not understand today is, that there is not that much difference between a fast mobile devices compared to a desktop computer.
The current version of Aerofly FS 2 allows full IFR flights.
Is this program worth the Money?

I can only assume that as a paying beta tester the final version will be $69 $79??, but for us Canadians it's $100


If by "he" you mean me, I'd prefer if you have something to say about me, you address me, thanks in advance. Is that what the good book teaches? I'd also prefer if you just let the whole thing go, maybe hit it next time and get on with how cool this particular sim is, it's looking better every day btw.'he' speaks amazingly like a lawyer...

6/3/2016 7:16am
Dear Aerofly users,
first of all, thank you very much for all the feedback and ideas, you have provided to us. As we see, the wishes are numerous and each user has its own priorities. It is a challenging task for us to come up with a good roadmap to please everybody.
The near future will bring the following main features to Aerofly FS 2:
- Higher resolution textures for aerial images
- SDK. The initial version of the SDK will offer the following features:
- An option to read simulation data via DLL or network
- A possibility to send back data into the simulation, e.g. control inputs.
- Tools and converters so you can add your own objects and airports to Aerofly- Improved usability of airliners, e.g. LNAV, VNAV, auto tuning, radio navigation
- From all the Emails we have received a good ATC module also has high priority on our side. This ATC module will most likely go through many iterations.
Of course this list is not exhaustive, so expect to see more features, where we haven't decided yet on the exact priority, like more system complexity, improved graphics, complex weather simulation and so on.
Besides those major points, we will in parallel work on other things like, Saitek support, Virtual Reality, new airplanes and airports, basically things that don't bind too many resources.
Please understand that we cannot give you exact dates. Experience has shown that it is difficult to estimate times to implement complex features like ATC.
Thanks again for supporting Aerofly FS 2.

No, that reply immediately followed the quotes from the author of this program in reply #40.If by "he" you mean me, I'd prefer if you have something to say about me, you address me, thanks in advance. Is that what the good book teaches? I'd also prefer if you just let the whole thing go, maybe hit it next time and get on with how cool this particular sim is, it's looking better every day btw.


ipacs aerofly [developer] Jun 2 @ 10:39am
[Official] High resolution aerial images
Dear Aerofly users,
as we have said before, we are currently working on a DLC with more high resolution aerial images.
However we want to hear your opinion here first.
Currently the base installation of Aerofly is around 30 GB of data and we don't really want to increase this yet, that's why we are planning optional DLCs for more content at no additional cost to you.
However we are unsure yet how we shall optimize our base package: Shall we add more high resolution aerial images around our airports and remove some world images or shall we keep the current base package the way it is?



lionheart
Did you purchase Aerofly from Steam or some other way