• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

Running 2 or more views in FSX?

Messages
144
Is it possible to have multiple views running in FSX?

For example, one one monitor you have the VC or spot view, and on another you have the view from a camera?

If not, perhaps it is possible using 2 PCs networked together both running FSX...?

Thanks,

Martin
 
Yes, you can have as many views as you wish (but if you also wish to have high framerates the useful amount is limited of course). I just tried it and for example when I added 4 views to my second monitor (each about a quarter of the screen) the framerate dropped from 24 to 6 :).
 
With 3 views on a modest 3.06GHz Xeon with 2x19" TFT's driven by a 256MB 6800 Ultra, I am getting about 17fps:



George
 
Ok thanks for that info. 6fps is certainly a little too low ;) . 17 is not too bad though - although not great - I may get more as I will not be using a VC, simply external views...

Looking at a couple of the commercial aircraft available (the Wilco 'Buses for example), it is possible to make "detachable" vector gauges to view on a separate monitor using GDI+.

From a purely practical point of view, how many monitors can be run from one PC? Using, for example, 2 very high end (1GB) dual head NVidia or ATI cards on a super high spec PC (quad core, 8GB RAM, Win XP x64 or Vista x64), would it be possible to run 4 monitors? And furthermore, would FSX support the use of this many monitors at one time?

I am thinking that even though one ultra high spec machine would be very expensive, it would still be cheaper (especially once you take into account multiple licenses for FSX and all the addons) than 2+ high spec machines...

2 more questions (sorry!):

1 - can external views form part of a gauge (you might be able to see where I am going with this... The A380)?

2 - Would it theoretically be possible to read airport data from an AFCAD or other file and "draw" a plan (looking down) schematic of the airport and your aircraft's current location in a gauge or external application (either on the same system or on a networked PC)?

I have tried to condense all my graphics related questions into a single post, so apologies for the lack of brevity! :)

Many thanks,

Martin
 
Last edited:
2 - Would it theoretically be possible to read airport data from an AFCAD or other file and "draw" a plan (looking down) schematic of the airport and your aircraft's current location in a gauge or external application (either on the same system or on a networked PC)?
FSNavigator does exactly this in FS9, an FSX version will be forthcoming.
 
Ok, so it is possible then! :cool:

Although FSNav does it, I would like to integrate that function into a custom MFD (using GDI+) so that it is a system "page".

Cheers!

Martin
 
At work I had a machine delivered that was spec'd specifically for FSX, but it came with an nVidia Quadro graphics card by accident. That is capable of running four monitors from one card. It's not accelerated anywhere near as well as a GeForce 6/7/8 series but I was surprised at how well it did run. (On a 2.6GHz Core2Quad Extreme 2GB RAM.) But then we've always known that FS is more CPU bound than by graphics hardware.

The Quadro's expensive though. I think they're about £700 each...

Si
 
Thanks for that info Simon.

That's not really much of a problem cost-wise - it would cost that for 2 GeForce or similar cards...!

I could put a Quadro in my older machine and just run displays from that, while having a really high end GeForce card in my new machine (which will be actually running FSX).

Does FSX actually support multiple [more than 2] monitors natively (so if I programmed the displays in GDI+ as part of FSX then it would work)?

How about multiple (identical) cards themselves? Will FSX play nice or not?

Cheers! :)

Martin



As an aside:

Quadro's never accelerate games as well as GeForce because the drivers are optimised for wireframe view for DCC applications such as Max/Maya/Blender.

Apparently there is a hack available to make drivers for Quadros work with GeForce cards (the cards are essentially the same, it's the drivers that are different, and which make Quadro cards so darn expensive). I don't think that applies as much to the latest cards though...
 
computer freezes with 4 monitors

I have an AMD 5600 dual core processor
Gigabyte motherboard with 2 PCIe x 16 slots
2 x 8800 GTS graphics cards, non SLI selected
4 Gig ram.
OS: XP pro 64 bit

When running FSX and FS9 on 2 monitors it works fine but when I select it to operate on 4 monitors it freezes. FSX recognizes 4 monitors and loads but freezes once it finishes loading.

I can spread the vies across the 4 monitors in window mode but when selecting full screen it freezes again.

FS9 recognizes 2 monitors whe n4 are hooked up but again freezes.

I thought this computer set up would run all this fine but there is obviously some conflict.

Changing specs to minimum do nothing.

I'd like to use just one computer but would I be better running Vista?
 
Back
Top