• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

Yahoo Satellite maps

Messages
57
Country
uruguay
Hi, I would like to know about the restrictions to use the satellite images provided by yahoo maps. I sent an email to the Yahoo developer network but i didn't get an answer yet. Has anybody had an experiencie with yahoo regarding this topic before? I'm concerned about copyrights infringements, I have heard Google is very strict in this, but I don't know anything about Yahoo. I would be using images just for the ground in the airport.
 
Hi,

As far as I know none of the providers allows you to use the imagery. So neither yahoo, bing or Google.
 
For the most part, I think they license it themselves, and hence they may not necessarily be the people to ask.
 
Well... i should spend about 400-500 usd just for the airport area... i think selling sceneries is not profitable.... i think i will loose money instead of earn something :banghead:
 
Yes, imagery is generally not cheap. Around 500 euro for the airport is unfortunately a quite normal price.

Did you try to contact the airport itself? Maybe the already own some imagery that they might allow you to use?
 
Well... i should spend about 400-500 usd just for the airport area... i think selling sceneries is not profitable.... i think i will loose money instead of earn something :banghead:
Ding ding ding!

Give that man a cigar!!
 
Yes, imagery is generally not cheap. Around 500 euro for the airport is unfortunately a quite normal price.

Did you try to contact the airport itself? Maybe the already own some imagery that they might allow you to use?
Good suggestion.
Most airports have aerial surveys conducted after some alterations to the field. These include multiple high-res photo's. You can ask the airport about those. They may or may not 'own' them, but they could give you the name of the photo survey company they used and you could ask them. They would normally keep these on file for historical reference. They may be a lot cheaper than a satellite image and a better quality. Make sure you get the lens type and sizes they used so you can properly adjust it for use without having distance distortion. Also make sure you tell them what you plan to do with the images. They may give them to you for free or a lower fee, but may not know you plan to use commercially(releasing scenery to the public is commercially even when free).

I used to work for a survey company as a rod-man. The file room was filled with surveys and imagery. Its a good place to look. In the US, everything in the survey file rooms is normally also available from the City, County, or State government offices they were filed with.
Traverse points, pk in disks, EOP's, EOS's, EOPT, Benchmarks, Benchruns, elevations, depths, locations of man-made objects, locations of natural objects, blueprint checking, storm/sewer placements, staking, silt placing, etc, etc.
There is a lot more to surveys than what it looks. The interesting parts were checking the foundations of a new building once the walls and roof was installed. If it was off by more than a few inches in placement or even thickness, the whole thing could be rejected by the owner, destroyed, and had to be rebuilt by the construction companies for free.
 
Back
Top